The Year That Was: 2014 in Film

Check out ALL of the PDC end of year lists!

Review: Ava DuVernay's 'Selma'

Starring David Oyelowo

Review: Rob Marshall's 'Into The Woods'

Starring Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt, and Anna Kendrick

Tim Burton's 'Big Eyes'

Starring Christoph Waltz and Amy Adams

Showing posts with label DC Comics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DC Comics. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

DC Comics to Bring 'Lucifer' TV Series to Fox


Yet another DC Comics series is coming to the small screen, and it's one that got a start in the pages of Neil Gaiman's Sandman, which is already being made into a movie. Deadline reports that Tom Kapinos (Californication) will write and exec-produce a pilot for Lucifer, based on Mike Carey's comics series.

Lucifer was largely based on the Paradise Lost version of the fallen angel, with some very obvious changes. The character Lucifer Morningstar first appeared in the pages of Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen back in 1962, but the modern version of him debuted in Gaiman's Sandman more than twenty years later. Carey spun the character off into a series that ran for more than six years, chronicling Lucifer's story as he abandons Hell to experience more earthly adventures. The TV show will be based on the comic and follow Lucifer as he opens a piano bar in Los Angeles with the aid of his female consort.

So add one more to Warner Bros. and DC's growing stable of shows that includes Arrow, The Flash, Constantine, Gotham, and potential series featuring Supergirl and Nightwing. Lucifer was designed to resemble David Bowie

Friday, September 5, 2014

So Now there's a Supergirl Series in the Works


A couple of days ago a rumor surfaced from our friends at Bleeding Cool that a Supergirl TV series was being pitched to networks, led by Green Lantern writer Michael Green. It made sense considering what Warner Bros. has been able to accomplish with Smallville and Arrow, and will attempt to do again with The Flash, Constantine, and Gotham. Now that story has been confirmed, albeit with a few changes that indicate this won't be anything like the Supergirl fans are accustomed to.

The update comes from Deadline who say Green has nothing to do with the project, with Arrow and The Flash producer Greg Berlanti developing it. He'll be working alongside Ali Adler (No Ordinary Family) who is coming aboard as writer and exec-producer. DC Comics' creative guru Geoff Johns will also be on board in an unspecified capacity, but knowing him he'll probably be a consultant who pitches in on scripts every now and then.

This will be "a brand new interpretation" of Supergirl, and I take that to mean there won't be any connection to Superman at all. This is still very early on as titles such as Super and Girl are being considered amongst others. Hopefully they don't go with either. We'll be learning more details in a couple of weeks when the show is pitched to other networks, meaning it may or may not end up on The CW. It could be that another network picks it up, like what happened when Fox landed Gotham.  I'm finding it hard to be interested in this flood of DC Comics shows for some reason. I love Arrow, but it took me awhile to warm up to it. I have zero interest in The Flash but will give it a shot, and the same goes for Gotham. Supergirl was always a derivative character (like 75% of DC's characters are) in my mind and unless there's a really unique angle on it there's little chance I'll be watching.

Sunday, July 27, 2014

New Trailers for 'Gotham', 'The Flash', and 'Arrow'!


When I was putting this article together I thought to myself, "For the title image I'll just use the logo for whatever the coolest trailer of the bunch happened to be", as you see above picking the best was easier said than done. For all of the "Marvel rules the world talk" you hear you'd think DC was all but dead, I'm here to tell you they are far from it. DC, with the success of Arrow has slowly been carving out a large share of TV land. Couple the fan reaction to the Dawn of Justice teaser this weekend with the sheer awesomelitude of these three trailers and you have a brand that seems poised to strike some serious blows to the Marvel stronghold. 

Before we get into the trailers I just want to point out how awesome it is to be having this conversation in 2014. After X-Men ignited the superhero frenzy in 2000 the masses have been saying that the comic book movie nirvana we've been living it had a definite shelf life. Here we are, some 14 years later, and the genre has never been stronger. I dare say it's here to stay. 

First we have a full trailer for Gotham. While there's not much here to judge the series potential as a whole it does give a good luck into the feel of the show. Plenty of one-shots at villains-to-be, a perfect recreation of the classic "Bruce's parents get whacked and he cries to the heavens at their feet" panel, and a good look at the eternal optimism of Jim Gordon. There's just a few things I need from the series in order for it to work. First and foremost I'd like Bruce to be in the far background of the events, the showrunners need to exhibit some serious willpower and make this show about Gotham itself, from the perspective of Jim Gordon. Second, I need them to resist the temptation of throwing winks at fanboys every week. Mainly they need to treat this world as if we knew nothing of what it would become, let the characters grow into their future selves organically and don't rush anything. Regardless, I'm all about it. 



Next up we have the first official teaser trailer for the new series on The CW, The Flash. Barry Allen debuted on Arrow last year to favorable fan reactions, leading to his own spin-off series. I'll admit I don't know a ton about where the series is going or what angle they will take but as long as they capture who Barry is as a person and handle it with the same ingeniouity that they've done over on Arrow I'll be happy.
 
Saving the best for last we have the season 3 trailer for Arrow. I've constantly beat myself up about not making this one of my "Must Watch" shows, I can't explain why I'm not caught up...the show is, by all accounts, amazing. The episodes I've watched I've thoroughly enjoyed (even if Katie Cassidy, a former favorite of mine, has lost a step), I just haven't made it a priority. I'm happy to say that this trailer for season 3 has adjusted my priorities and starting today I'll be streaming Arrow on Netflix in an effort to catch up before the premier. Not being an avid watcher at this point it's possible I'm missing some things but to my eyes this series has everything. Like a more mature Smallville with all of the comicy goodness and none of the saccharine Sweet Valley High drama, Arrow seems to have found a way to avoid the palpable cheapness of superhero shows past. The action looks amazing, the heroes and villains plentiful, and the story real. I don't think I'm overstating to say that this next season of Arrow could be some of the best comic based TV we've ever seen. 

Sunday, March 30, 2014

DC Comics "Film Series" to be Revealed Soon


Warner Bros. Pictures CEO Kevin Tsujihara was apparently quite the fountain of information to The New York Times, spilling the beans on J.K. Rowling's 'Fantastic Beasts' trilogy, and now talking about the future of DC-based movies. In NYT's assessment of Tsujihara's comments, it appears that an announcement on new superhero movies is coming soon...

"As for DC Entertainment, cross-studio collaboration to make better use of its comic book characters appears to have accelerated considerably since Mr. Tsujihara took over, in part because he eliminated some management layers. (He has not named a chief operating officer and did not replace Mr. Rosenblum and Mr. Robinov, choosing instead to divide up their duties and assume some himself.) Two new television shows are coming to the CW and Fox, including one based on the Flash and another on a young Batman, and a film series will be announced in the near future, Mr. Tsujihara said. It is expected to include a "Justice League" movie.

Justice League is the one we were all expecting, but who else might that include? Probably Wonder Woman, since she's certain to appear in Man of Steel 2 played by Gal Gadot. A new Green Lantern movie, maybe? Perhaps Lobo with Dwayne Johnson in the lead? And what about Guillermo Del Toro's Justice League Dark?

All are possibilities, and chances are we won't learn anything concrete until July when they can make a big splashy Hall H announcement at Comic-Con.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson Teases Major DC Comics Project


While his Fast & Furious pal Vin Diesel has already teased his way into Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy (and potentially other Marvel projects), things haven't worked out quite as well for Dwayne Johnson and Warner Bros. A few years ago he was rumored to play the villain Black Adam in a Power of Shazam movie, which would have been awesome. And recently he was linked to Brad Peyton's shelved Lobo film. But is it possible one or both of these projects is back on? Certainly The Rock has something cookin' with the studio, according to his latest tweet...
He could be talking about a comic book project but...nah, not likely. Does this mean he's landed a role in Man of Steel 2? Maybe in the part Jason Momoa has been mentioned for? Is the Lobo project suddenly revived? Johnson and Peyton are definitely familiar with one another after Journey 2: The Mysterious Island, so why waste what has already been proven to work? Or maybe it's something altogether new that we haven't heard anything about? Anybody considered him for Green Lantern, maybe? He'd make a Hell of a John Stewart. In fact, Johnson seems to agree that would be a sweet move....
Let the speculation begin. 

Monday, June 17, 2013

Why I'm Not About That 'Man of Steel' Life




So Man of Steel came out and made a gang of money this weekend. Like a hundred and twenty-five million or still, this movie has seemed to become the most divisive movie of the year so far. With its certified rotten critic score on Rotten Tomatoes and with a lot of super vocal fans on social media loving it or hating it and arguing back and forth the division is clear. See, I was asked to write this piece because I hate Man of Steel.  Now, to preface I've been vocal to many people that I’m pretty much done with the superhero movie, 2012 burnt me out on the genre. Like, real talk, after Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises what else is there to say now? Well, for me, at a minimum all the 3D spectacle and bombast has become played out. I want a bit more, something else to explore.  So the following are my reasons for not liking Man of Steel, from a personal point of view.


I don’t really understand what this movie is trying to say or maybe I do and I just can’t buy the cynical nature of it. I really don’t understand the need to darken up Superman or to make it more “real” which to me is pretty stupid because we have literally nothing in reality to base what it would be like to have a Superman in our world or even any alien for that matter. Is it really necessary for Superman to fight General Zod and smash through the city of Metropolis and not once care or try to protect the people of the city from the fight. Now there was some of that in the earlier Smallville set piece but even then it felt like an afterthought when he saved a single solider. Superman seemed to not go out of his way to protect people once he put the costume on.  Which I feel totally goes against what we know about the character of Superman. He’s a protector first and a warrior second.

Another issue is whether Superman ever really makes a decision for himself? His choices seemed to be put upon him. Now, I think that works in the heroic journeys where the hero is a kid but Superman is a 33 year old man. He’s seen the world from what we can tell, yet he never once drives the story. His two fathers make all of the hard choices for him. We never see Superman make a leading decision; he’s responsive to everything that happens to him. My father told me not to save him. My birth father told me I have to be this heroic symbol. My birth father told me I have to stop Zod. With all the comparison to Nolan’s Batman people are forgetting one thing in that Bruce Wayne chose all of his actions, from learning to be a ninja, to dressing as a bat, from using fear, to taking the rap, all the way to spying on the city to catch joker and so on. 

This Superman does make one choice and it’s that choice which is getting all of the attention, his decision to murder Zod. Now I could get extra geeky and say why that’s wrong on a character level (and then someone will drop Superman #22 on me which, by the way broke the character also) and that it doesn't fit Superman. To me, that act wasn’t earned. It felt like the filmmakers put him in that place so that he has to kill Zod. Superman then just screams and gets over it. That’s it? So that’s where we go to get people to like Superman again? Why take a character that serves to be something we can aspire to and bring him down to that level. You have a character that can do anything and you can’t find a way for him to stop Zod without murdering him? Really though for me that was just the icing on the cake, I thought that Superman killing all of the Kryptonian babies was a worse act entirely that last push over the edge with killing Zod means that this isn’t a Superman for me. I didn’t grow up liking Superman, actually as small child Superman the Motion Picture made me not like Superman at all. I didn’t like Superman until 1996 with a perfect storm of the miniseries Kingdom Come and the premiere of Superman: The Animated Series on the WB. The two stories, one of a rookie Superman and another of a Superman who left because the heroes didn’t care about city they protected and instead took extreme measures, really got me to enjoy the character from a new point of view.  I found his ability to hold back and always find a way and see the good in everyone refreshing.

 I really have no want to watch a "BADASS" Superman. I know it’s something that others want but to me, that's just boring. Everything is “badass” now for some reason that is used to equate an evolution or sophistication. It’s doesn't add any sophistication or evolution and is pretty juvenile, not to mention that it doesn’t send the right message to children. I’m not going to lie I want Superman to punch something too, but I just wished what we got was a little lighter and hopeful.  It’s interesting to me that as Marvel is crafting movies from their catalogue of characters they are choosing characters who are less dark and less cynical in their comic roots and everyone loves it.  They took characters made to fit into our world with stories that get really dark and decided to take some of that away and instead make them more mythic. It seems that Warner Bros. and DC have decided to go in the opposite direction with their transition in order to compete. Well, if they want the "badass" crown they can have it cause I’m out.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Rumor Mill: Emily Blunt in Batman 3?

Yeah, this one's a bit gooey so just take it as a rumor for now, although if it happens I'll be pleased as friggin' punch. Batman on Film received a tip from the dreaded "industry insider" suggesting that Emily Blunt could possibly be up for the role of Selina Kyle in Christopher Nolan's upcoming Batman film. Selina Kyle is the real name for catburglar/Batman love interest Catwoman. Emily Blunt recently passed on a chance to play the female lead in The First Avenger: Captain America, and the speculation is that she might've done so to avoid any scheduling conflicts with the still untitled Batman film.

Keep in mind that nobody knows if Catwoman will even be in the film, so already attaching actors to any roles is silly at this point. However, she would be a great pick. Remember she was up for the role of Black Widow in Iron Man 2 before it was given to Scarlett Johannson, so presumably she has some experience(albeit on the losing end) vying for the role of comic book vixens.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Angela Bassett Joins Green Lantern



 
 Because every comic book film needs a tough as nails government douche, Angela Bassett(Strange Days) has signed on to play Amanda "The Wall" Waller in DC's upcoming Green Lantern film. The veteran actress joins Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, Peter Saarsgard, and Mark Strong in the already impressive cast.

In DC Comics continuity, Waller is the abrasive leader of the Suicide Squad, a government super-team comprised entirely of criminals. She's mainly been a thorn in the side of forces such as the Justice League(Batman in particular), mainly due to her attitude and "by any means necessary" approach to completing missions and general lack of respect for the superhero universe.

I've always found Angela Bassett to be one of the sexiest women in Hollywood and an amazing actress. While she doesn't have Waller's look, she's perfect for the part. 

You can read more of Variety's coverage of this story here.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Superman.....Reborn??? Seven Batman Films??

I know, everytime I write anything involving the possible return of The Man of Steel to the big screen, I use that cheesy heading. I'm simply ripping off the bombastic titles of the comics I grew with.  In this case, the it could be more apt than normal.  A few months ago if you'll recall, DC Comics was reworked into DC Entertainment. Time Warner, their parent company, began a focus of fully utilizing their stable of iconic comic book characters, whether it be in movies, TV, licensing, whatever.

If what Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes recently let fly during a conference call is true, I think we're about to see a deluge of superhero films on the horizon...

"We are going to have a fairly interesting set of announcements and presentations pretty soon like in a matter of weeks, I think, about our plans for DC," Bewkes said. "And basically if you look across the title of the whole band of hits whether its Batman, The Dark Knight, Green Lantern coming up, Superman, there have been a huge number of franchised films that have been part of the Warner [tent pole] strategy that's been the reason for Warner's unparallel high and consistent earnings advantage over the other studios and DC has already been a part of that and we are now going to outline an even more expansive plan for that in the coming months."

Let's not mince words: This means Superman. Despite Batman's monster box office success, I think few would argue that Superman is the most visible and recognizable superhero in the world. Superman Returns, while financially successful, was a creative disaster that ground to a halt any plans to expand the franchise. Attempts at another film, either a reboot or an imagining, have been on the backburner ever since, although rumors have never really stopped. In fact, Bewkes makes sure to mention Supes later on in the call...

“We look at Harry Potter. It’s fantastic to have franchises that last that long. We want to do that with Batman and Superman and perhaps Sherlock Holmes. The sequels are as good, with new characters added, as were the originals. That wasn’t the case in the years ago. Warners has more tentpoles as an on-going strategy taht very much lifts its distribution and performance. We think that’s going to hold up our slate in the 2009 - 2010 period. We’ve got four more big tentpoles coming this year.”

What was that? Seven Batmans? Seven Sherlock Holmes'? Que? On it's face, this isn't really that outlandish of a statement. Every studio head wants their movies to be so successful that they can spawn endless sequels. It's just unrealistic, due to (typically) dwindling profit margins, talent departures, creative differences, contract woes, etc. I think the main thing to take from these two statements from Bewkes, is that they're going to be looking beyond Batman and Superman, and probably digging deeper into the DC catalogue. We've already seen some of this with the Lobo project, and the upcoming Jonah Hex. I expect it's going to not only continue, but get a whole lot more crowded in the superhero film genre.

Thanks to Slashfilm and Superhero Hype for their coverage of this story.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Green Lantern, Superman, and Rorschach All in the Same Film?


Has it been an amazing couple of years for Jackie Earle Haley or what? After so many years basically on the Hollywood Do Not Call List, his epic comeback began with his gut wrenching turn in Little Children. He's gone from playing one effed up dude after another since, taking on the role of Rorschach in Watchmen, and recently we've seen the first images of him as the scarred dreamkiller Freddy Kreuger. Now the rumors are that Haley is being courted to take on the role of yet another demented figure, that of Sinestro in the upcoming Green Lantern film!

For those who haven't boned up on their Green Lantern lore, Sinestro is Hal Jordan's former friend turned bitter rival and arch nemesis. Speculation is that Sinestro will mostly be played up as a teacher to the newly anointed GL, but that his turn to the dark side will be crucial to the story possibly as a springboard to the sequel. Whatever the case may be, the idea of Haley teaming up with Ryan Reynolds has made me far more interested in this film than I already was. The only thing that sucks is the delays caused by their move out of Australia.

There's also been talk that DC possibly might try to work in a cameo by the big blue & red boyscout, Superman, into the film. Nothing has been confirmed other than he's supposedly in one version of the GL script. This is probably stemming from the legal disputes centered around the use of the Superman character. DC/WB need to use the character in some way on screen or face further legal issues with the Siegel Family estate, and this might be part of their plan to do so. That leads to the inevitable question of who would be playing Supes? Brandon Routh? God I hope not. I'd rather see Dean Cain than Routh again. Personally I'm betting that it'll be someone totally new, in order to get as much distance from Superman Returns as possible while also gauging interest in the future health of the franchise.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

This is a Joke, right? Beyonce in the Invisible Jet? Naahhh!


DC must not like their heroes all that much. Atleast not when it comes to casting. I mean, we were a hair's breadth away from Nicolas Cage sporting the red and blue tights. And let's not forget Halle Berry, looking sickly and malnourished at that, posing as the world's worst Catwoman. Now this? Surely they don't have a death wish, do they?

At a supposed press conference attended by Comicbookmovie, Beyonce spilled her guts on the prospect of playing Wonder Woman. According to her it's all but a done deal. She says she will be meeting up with the writers and directors soon, but things should start happening around mid-2010. The movie will be written by the same guys who wrote GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra, and directed by John Moore. John Moore took a hatchet to the Max Payne film earlier this year.

Say wha? Not to say that the fine fellows at comicbookmovie are untrustworthy, but I can't find any corroborating details anywhere, which is unusual. Especially for a story of this magnitude. So take this with a grain of salt. Or better yet, a whole salt shaker.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

No Love for the Man of Steel?


When Diane Nelson took over as head of DC Entertainment, it was assumed that putting together a reboot of the flagging Superman film franchise would be top of their list. Batman's great and all, but Superman's supposed to be their flagship character, so you'd think putting that ship sailing straight would be a priority.

Not so much.

In an interview with MTV, Diane let it be known in no uncertain terms that there ain't nothin' goin' on in that front. The big blue boyscout continues to ride the pine.

We actually don't have any current plans for Superman," said Nelson when asked if the new environment (and the recent legal decision regarding the character) made a "Superman" movie more or less likely in the near future.

You'd think he was part of The Outsiders or the Justice Society or somethin', not the most iconic character in the company's history. The fact remains that WB needs to have a Superman film out there by 2011, otherwise they face a potential lawsuit at the hands of the Siegel and Schuster estates. So something's gotta get done soon. I'm of the firm belief that WB will work out some sort of deal that will give them more time to produce a quality film, probably in 2012 or 2013, but surely 2011 is out of the picture at this point.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Ritchie and Lobo; a Match Made in Hell?


The former Mr. Madonna, Guy Ritchie, has inked a deal with Warner Bros. to direct Lobo, a big screen actioner about a cosmic bounty hunter who makes the DC Comics universe his home. The film will be next on Ritchie's list after Sherlock Holmes, which opens on Christmas Day.

Lobo was one of DC's most popular characters during the 90's, and is often compared to Marvel's Wolverine due to their similar power set, appearance, hard nose laconic attitude, and penchant for extreme violence. Despite this, Warner Bros. is shooting for a PG-13 rating when production begins early in 2010. The story has already been set, featuring Lobo arriving on Earth to bring in four violent fugitives. Lobo seeks the aid of a teenaged girl to help bring them in.

I guess WB never got a look at X-men Origins: Wolverine and exactly how lousy it's PG-13 made it. Well, Lobo would be worse. Imagine the Punisher with a PG-13 rating. Would you pay to see that? Neither would I. This adds another to an already impressive stable of WB comic book adaptations, but I have a feeling they've already sh*t the bed on Lobo before it's even under way. Ritchie is a great choice to direct, but his style doesn't lend itself to being reigned in. They might as well have chosen somebody else.

Monday, July 20, 2009

The Flash and DC make a Run at the Big Screen!


Marvel better watch out. DC is about to step their game up. The Hollywood Reporter broke the story last night that famed comic book scribe, Geoff Johns, has been hired by Warner Brothers to produce and co-write a feature film based on The Flash. The Flash, the fastest superhero on the planet, is one of the most popular superheroes in comics and is a stalwart member of the Justice League. Johns, who has been the central figure in reinvigorating the DC universe, is currently at the helm as writer of the Flash:Rebirth and Green Lantern comics. As of right now no director has been attatched to the film.

In related news, Warner Brothers has also hired on Grant Morrison and Marv Wolfman, two comics legends, to work alongside Johns in shepherding their upcoming slate of supehero films. On the table is a possible Adam Strange sci-fi film, a possible Aquaman film(hopefully not starring Adrien Grenier!), and a slew of other new projects on top of the ones that have already been announced.

There is little doubt that if Warners ever got off their asses and really put their library of characters out there they would slaughter Marvel in the world of film. DC has the most iconic characters in the game, recognizable by people who wouldn't know a funny book from a funnybone. Bringin in Johns, Morrison, and Wolfman, three proven greats at wielding a pen only lends more credibility and solidifies their desire to make these films both for the hardcore fan and the average filmgoer. Brilliant stroke by DC and WB.

Now the question for me becomes: What is Grant Morrison going to be writing? He's proven that he has a knack for Batman as solid as anybody else. Could he possibly be coming on board to aid that franchise, now in a bit of disarray? The superhero film world just got a lot more interesting.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Ryan Reynolds Confirmed for Green Lantern


Updating a report released just yesterday morning, Reuters is confirming that Ryan Reynolds has been chosen to take on the role of Green Lantern in the upcoming superhero film based on the DC Comics character. After a months of searching and speculation that encompassed many of Hollywood's biggest names, Reynolds won out in a final round of screen tests against the likes of Bradley Cooper, Justin Timberlake, and...Jared Leto? Why was he even allowed in the room?

Reynolds has quickly become the go-to guy for headlinging superhero franchises and is now the first actor to play both a DC and a Marvel superhero. He started out taking on the role of Hannibal King in Blade:Trinity. Earlier this year he was Deadpool in Wolverine: Origins and has already begun work on a spin-off of that film. Now the question becomes which of the many Green Lanterns will Reynolds be playing? One would expect it to be Hal Jordan, but Reynolds age and appearance bear a closer resemblance to Kyle Rayner, the youngest of all the GLs.

The most important question now is: What happens to his relationship with Scarlett Johannson? Green Lantern and the Black Widow can't date. That's like...crossing the streams or something in terms of comic book continuity, ain't it?

Friday, March 20, 2009

From JTK to GL: Chris Pine to play Green Lantern


IESB and Latino Review are reporting that Chris Pine, who is already set to play James T. Kirk in the new Star Trek reboot, has been offered the lead role in Warner Bros. upcoming Green Lantern film. He would be taking on the role of Hal Jordan, without doubt the most well known ringbearer and one of the DC Comics most iconic heroes.


I'm kinda diggin' this selection if this pans out. Although Jordan is a man in his 30's, Pine seems to occupy a middle ground where he could appeal to both new and older fans. I still think ultimately he would be a better fit for Kyle Rayner, the GL who replaced Hal Jordan for awhile, but there's no way in hell they'd do a Green Lantern film without Hal.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

WB and Marvel Studios Reveal Movie Release Schedule


It's good to be a comic book fan. Especially if you're someone who loves comic books brought to the big screen. Never mind the dregs like League of Extraordinary Gentlemen or even The Spirit, the vast majority of funnybook based movies have been winners over the last few years. With that said, the 2010 and 2011 release dates released by WB and Marvel yesterday should be enough to have all of us superhero giddy with excitement.

Warner Bros. has set a release date of August 6, 2010 for the Josh Brolin starring Jonah Hex, about the scarred cowboy anti-hero. John Malkovich is slated to co-star as his archnemesis, Turnbull. The long awaited Green Lantern, directed by Martin Campbell, has a release date of December 17, 2010 just in time for Christmas. Seems like an odd time for a superhero movie to me. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows pt. 2 is set to drop on July 15, 2011.

Marvel Studios has no less than four major comic book franchises set to take over theaters in the next two years. Here's hoping they stop fuckin' around and get some of these people signed. But as it stands right now, the highly anticipated sequel to Iron Man is set for May 7, 2010. No word on Mickey Rourke or who's playing the Black Widow as of now. The Kenneth Branagh directed Thor, about the Asgardian Thunder god, is set for July 16, 2010, only two months after Iron Man 2. The First Avenger: Captain America is set to sling it's shield on May 6, 2011. And what has to be a highly tentative date right now, The Avengers film is set for July 15, 2011.

Ok, Thor is set to drop a mere two months after Iron Man 2, which if both those dates hold firm, will essentially assure Marvel's dominance over the film market for that year. Jonah Hex, which comes out a month after Thor, might be the victim of comic book movie fatigue at that point. I just don't see there being enough room in people's minds for a little known character after such high profile superhero films. Also, take a look at 2011. Harry Potter and the Avengers are right now headed for a might vs. magic showdown. There's no way this schedule stands for these two films. One of these studios is going to have to cave in and move their release date up or down a few weeks. Marvel and WB are gonna have to play a little game of chicken to see who finally balks here, and I for one am very interesed in finding out who it is. My guess is Marvel will inevitably be forced to move The Avengers back a few months, maybe into 2012, but we shall see.

Monday, November 10, 2008

A Film Ruined Before it Starts: McG to Direct, Beyonce to Star in Wonder Woman?

Granted this is still in the early stages, it's being reported that McG is at the front of the line to direct the big screen version of DC Comics heroine, Wonder Woman. No truth to the rumors that he will cast Drew Barrymore in the title role, and she would defeat her enemies with a wink of her middle-aged eye.

What's worse, supposedly Beyonce has been in meetings to star as the Amazonian bombshell. In an interview with Hero Complex, she expressed her feeling to be a part of the superhero movie universe. No desire to actually act or anything, just be a part of the universe.

Somebody get her a copy of Birds of Prey and let this be over with!