The Year That Was: 2014 in Film

Check out ALL of the PDC end of year lists!

Review: Ava DuVernay's 'Selma'

Starring David Oyelowo

Review: Rob Marshall's 'Into The Woods'

Starring Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt, and Anna Kendrick

Tim Burton's 'Big Eyes'

Starring Christoph Waltz and Amy Adams

Showing posts with label david slade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label david slade. Show all posts

Friday, December 12, 2014

George R.R. Martin and David Slade Reportedly Teaming Up for Vampire Tale, 'Fevre Dream'


While fans of George R.R. Martin's Game of Thrones continue to be hopeful the denizens of Westeros will end up on the big screen some day, the author could be adapting another of his novels into a feature film. Martin has written plenty of other novels outside of his "A Song of Fire and Ice" series, and one of those is the vampire story, Fevre Dream, described as "Bram Stoker meets Mark Twain". The book has been adapted into a graphic novel series and has been planned for a movie for years, but now it seems to be moving forward with a new director who is very familiar with the world of vampires.

According to a story at The Tracking Board, David Slade is on board to direct Fevre Dream, making this his third time directing a vampire movie. He's told the story of gorgeous vamps with The Twilight Saga: Eclipse and evil bloodsuckers with 30 Days of Night. Martin's 1982 novel is set in the 19th-century and follows a riverboat captain who discovers that the rich benefactor he's ferrying along the Mississippi River is a vampire hoping to free his people from the need for human blood.

Martin has mostly stayed away from feature projects since 1987 when he had a bad experience adapting his novella, Nightflyers.

Friday, May 3, 2013

Sure Shots: Sarah Gadon; Annette Bening; David Slade



* Having appeared in three movies by David Cronenberg (A Dangerous Method, Cosmopolis) and his son Brandon (Antiviral), Sarah Gadon has not only proven herself a favorite of theirs, but she's also becoming a staple of really creepy films. Which makes her the perfect choice to join Dracula with Luke Evans. Directed by Gary Shore, the origin story will combine mythology and history to tell how Prince Vlad made the ultimate sacrifice to become the world's first vampire, and the inspiration for Bram Stoker's novel. [Variety]

* There are some changes afoot for Imagine, the directorial debut by Crazy Stupid Love scribe, Dan Fogelman. Last October it was reported that Julianne Moore and Jeremy Renner would be joining Al Pacino in the story of an aging rocker who discovers he has an adult son after reading an unopened letter from John Lennon. But those two are now out, and it looks as if they'll be replaced by Annette Bening and Bobby Cannavale. Cannavale will play Pacino's son, taking on a role that had also been circled by Steve Carell, who is still on board as a producer. It's a big move for Cannavale, who made his breakthrough in The Station Agent opposite Peter Dinklage and Michelle Williams.  Even so, this is a severe drop in star-wattage that hopefully won't derail the film from getting made.

* David Slade (30 Days of Night) had been slated to helm a Daredevil reboot, but he gave it up to direct NBC's Hannibal. Wise move, sir. But he's heading back to the big screen now to direct The Widow, which centers on "a young woman who befriends a lonely widow only to discover that their encounter was not a coincidence." [THR]

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Daredevil film rights revert back to Marvel; Will he turn up in Phase Three?




The hopes and dreams of fanboys that some day Marvel will be able to field their entire line-up of superheroes in one massive cinematic spectacle are probably never going to be realized, but the chances of Daredevil turning up on The Avengers just became a little greater. Back before Marvel smartened up, they licensed out the film rights to a large number of their characters. 20th Century Fox, who own the rights to Fantastic Four and the X-men, also had the blind superhero, Daredevil. After the Ben Affleck-led 2003 film failed to deliver, they've been trying to mount another one before the rights would lapse and revert back to Marvel. That obviously never happened, and now the character is back under the Marvel/Disney umbrella.


Marvel President Kevin Feige confirmed the news during a conversation with Newsarama, but nothing further was said on the matter. This comes after Fox really scrambled to put a new film together over the last year. David Slade (Hard Candy) had been attached to it for a long time, before ultimately dropping out a few months ago to helm NBC's Hannibal. Already under a time crunch, Fox reached out to Joe Carnahan (The Grey), who offered up a hard-boiled 1970s approach which was rejected. It was last summer we learned that Fox was willing to just let the character go when the October deadline hit, and that looks to have happened.

So what does this mean for the future of Daredevil? That's anybody's guess, but it's likely that Marvel will take their time and figure out the best way to bring him into the fold. Daredevil comes with a built-in fanbase and a tone that is more along the lines of film noir, which could go a long way in spicing up Phase Three. Right now we know that Edgar Wright's Ant-Man and a Dr. Strange film are part of the next wave.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Sure Shots: Jon Chu; Jeremy Renner; Nick Cassavetes


* Last fall, David Slade decided that directing one YA flick in The Twilight Saga: Eclipse wasn't enough, and became set to helm Disney's adaptation of Ally Condie's sci-fi series, Matched. But a deal couldn't be struck, and now THR says G.I. Joe: Retaliation and Step Up 3 director Jon Chu is on board. The first of a trilogy, the story is set in a future society(aren't they all??) where all free choice has been removed, even who one can love. That is until a girl rebels against the system and falls in love with a man she's not supposed to be with. The script was written by Michelle and Kieran Mulroney (Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows), who obviously know a thing or two about franchises.

* Jeremy Renner's 2013 won't be feature quite the same number of blockbusters as last year, but it's still looking pretty strong. He'll be starring opposite Christian Bale and Bradley Cooper in David O. Russell's untitled Abscam flick, and now he's just added a new project to be directed by Michael Cuesta(12 and Holding). Renner will star in Kill the Messenger, based on the true story of journalist Gary Webb who was smeared by the government and ultimately committed suicide after he linked the CIA to a cocaine smuggling operation and a plot to arm Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The film is based on two books, Kill the Messenger: How the CIA’s Crack-Cocaine Controversy Destroyed Journalist Gary Webb, and Gary Webb's own Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion. Peter Landesman (Parkland) will adapt the script, with production set to begin this summer. Finally, Renner is back to actually having a chance to act again. He hasn't really had to do it since The Town. [Deadline]

* You may or may not recall that last November we learned of a promising comedy titled The Other Woman, which was notable only in that Cameron Diaz and Kristen Wiig were circling the two lead roles. We didn't anything else about it until now, with Nick Cassavetes now in line to direct. Assuming Diaz comes aboard, she'll be reuniting with her My Sister's Keeper director, a possibility that doesn't excite me in the least. Written by Melissa Stack, the story follows a woman who realizes her boyfriend is actually married, then teams up with his wife to get revenge. Diaz and Wiig would make a pretty formidable comedic pair, but Cassavetes' films always lean towards the manipulative. Couldn't they find somebody else for this job? [Variety]

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Josh Trank confirmed for 'Fantastic Four'; David Slade exits 'Daredevil'



It's appropriate that news like this would bust out just as Comic-Con is kicking into high gear, even though it follows two properties that haven't had a presence here in years. As we all know, 20th Century Fox holds a number of significant Marvel superhero properties. The most prominent of these are the X-men, and the two we're getting updates on now, Fantastic Four and Daredevil.

First, Fox has been keen on rebooting Fantastic Four, even though the first two movies performed well at the box office. Nobody really liked them, however, and the studio recently had their sights set on Josh Trank(Chronicle) to take Marvel's "First Family" in a new direction. Well, Deadline reports that he is now confirmed to direct the film, probably making it his next project. He's also attached to helm a Venom spinoff, and an adaptation of the Shadow of the Colossus video game.



As for Daredevil, Fox has been under the gun to try and get a reboot made on the blind lawyer/superhero's adventures, hiring David Slade(30 Days of Night) to direct. With a script already in place, Fox just hit a major stumbling block as Slade has now dropped out, citing upcoming commitments. The thing about these licensed properties is that they revert back to Marvel if nothing is done with them, which is why you see sequels to movies that probably didn't do so well in the first place. Fox apparently has until the fall to get Daredevil into production before they revert back to Marvel, and you know they won't hesitate to make him a part of their larger Avengers universe.

So these are two movies to keep an eye on for very different reasons. Trank is an excellent director with a lot of promise, and if things go as expected we'll see Fantastic Four in 2014. As for Daredevil, expect a mad dash to find a director in the next few days.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Sunday, April 29, 2012

David James Kelly to script 'Daredevil' reboot


Apparently I'm one of the few who really liked Marvel's first stab at a Daredevil film, which starred Ben Affleck as the titular blind superhero. It wasn't perfect, but the darker tone was spot on, and Affleck captured Matt Murdock's dual personalities quite well. I kept waiting for a sequel, but instead all we got was the terrible Elektra spinoff with Jennifer Garner. So I was pretty excited when David Slade(Hard Candy) was brought in last year to take over a relaunch for 20th Century Fox. Last June we learned that Brad Michael Kane(Fringe) would be penning the script, but that appears to have fallen through because a new scribe has come aboard.

David James Kelly has taken over writing chores on the film, which as we previously learned will be based on the classic Born Again storyline. The classic 1986 storyline was written by Frank Miller with beautiful art by David Mazzucchelli, and I've often referred to it as Daredevil's The Empire Strikes Back moment. In it, Matt Murdock's old girlfriend, Karen Page, sells his superhero identity to the Kingpin, with the crime boss using his vast influence to ruin Murdock's life, driving the hero insane. Daredevil is a character who has sunk to unbelievable depths during his run, but nothing compared to what happens to him here.

Fox is in an interesting position here. As they hold the licenses to the X-men, Fantastic Four, and Daredevil, they have to keep these movies comin' in order to maintain the rights. So we'll always see relaunches and reboots in some fashion. It would be in Fox's best interests to maybe try and do what Marvel has done with their Avengers line, and maybe try to put together a shared cinematic universe? It's not as far fetched as you may think.

No release date is set for Daredevil just yet, as the next step will be finding someone to star. Robert Pattinson's name had been floated at one point, but that's probably not going to happen. [Deadline]

Monday, March 21, 2011

David Slade updates on Daredevil, The Wolverine rumors


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

A couple of bits related to the Daredevil relaunch announced just last week, both potentially pretty big. When the story broke, the initial news was that Fox was planning on this not being a total reboot but a "continuation" of the unpopular 2003 film starring Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner.  That made me happy, not so much anybody else. That's fine.  Well, director David Slade took to Twitter to address this issue specifically, and he seems to have a completely different idea of how this new Daredevil will be approached...

Forgot tolook at the internet for a few weeks and its a litany of false (and not so far off) rumours. So without breaking confidentiality, yes Daredevil, we have a great outline for a very strong character driven take on Mr Matt Murdock. It will bare no relation to the previous Daredevil movie in any way. We are at early planning stages and have not yet discussed any cast.

I guess that knocks out those Robert Pattinson rumors, too. Breathing easier now. I understand Slade's reluctance to be associated with such a critical failure, but personally I'm disappointed. Expect the casting to go much younger this time around.

Also it's clear that Slade must be a loyal reader of our humble site. Slade was one of the top 2 or 3 guys to be taking on the directing gig for Fox's Wolverine sequel before the job ultimately went to Darren Aronofsky. Not a day after Slade signed on the Daredevil gig, Aronofsky stepped down from The Wolverine, and immediately I(and others) speculated that Slade has to be on the horn with his agent right now. Who wouldn't want to direct Wolverine over Daredevil? No-brainer, right?  Wrong.  Again on Twitter...

"WOLVERINE, there have been no discussions about this project to date."

"Interesting to see what will happen with that as the again excellent script by Chris McQuarrie was set largely in Japan."

Yeah..."to date".  Doesn't mean it won't happen. I'm gonna jump out there right now and say that Slade will end up directing The Wolverine. That film, and the happiness of star Hugh Jackman, have to be top priority. If Jackman decides he wants Slade, then expect Fox to go that route. Daredevil might benefit from a younger, less established overseer who can pump new life into the character.




Thursday, March 17, 2011

Darren Aronofsky no longer directing The Wolverine




If it feels like I've been writing about superheroes all day it's because I have been, but this is too big of a story to let slide. THR is reporting that Oscar nominated director, Darren Aronofsky, has backed out of directing the X-men spinoff, The Wolverine. Aronofsky had been tapped to reteam with Hugh Jackman(The Fountain) on the superhero sequel, taking the X-men's clawed Canadian to Japan. In fact, the location has turned out to be part of the problem. Aronofsky says...

"As I talked more about the film with my collaborators at Fox, who have been totally supportive throughout my work on the movie, it became clear that the production of The Wolverine would keep me out of the country for almost a year. I was not comfortable being away from my family for that length of time. I am sad that I won’t be able to see the project through, as it is a terrific script and I was very much looking forward to working with my friend, Hugh Jackman, again."

The Wolverine was a much sought after directing gig, with numerous names having lobbied for the job. I wonder what David Slade(Hard Candy) thinks of this. He was probably the strongest contender, but he just signed on to direct Daredevil. If only he'd waited one more day!

Fox has already issued a statement on the matter...

"While we are of course disappointed that Darren can’t do The Wolverine, we also understand and respect his reasons. Having done both The Wrestler and Black Swan with Darren, we know he is an extraordinary talent and we look forward to working with him on other projects in the future. Hugh Jackman and Fox both remain fully committed to making The Wolverine. We will regroup and move forward aggressively."

So now who do you think will take over? The Wolverine seemed like one comic book story tailor made for Aronofsky's style and sensibilities. Does all that change now? Any chance Fox let's Slade jump from one comic book property to this one?

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Daredevil relaunch in the works; David Slade to direct


I feel like I'm the only person on the planet who actually liked Daredevil. Most folks I know wiped their butts with copies of the 2003 superhero flick, which saw Ben Affleck starring as the blind lawyer turned vigilante. I thought Affleck nailed the part, and even dug the different spin on his arch nemesis, the Kingpin.  Whether people like it or not, it was a modest financial success, earning over $170M worldwide against an $80M budget. A spinoff, starring Affleck's then future wife Jennifer Garner as Elektra, was a straight up dud, though. The lukewarm critical response ultimately shuttered plans for a Daredevil franchise. Until now, it seems.

Variety reports that Fox is looking to relaunch Daredevil in a big way, bringing in David Slade to direct. Slade last helmed The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, which I affectionately refer to as "the good one". There had been talk for some time that some of the smaller scale licensed superheroes needed to have projects developed for them(Fantastic Four, Ghost Rider, Daredevil) or risk being reverted back to Marvel. That seems to be paramount in Fox's sudden push.


Those hoping that what director Mark Steven Johnson did with the first movie will be ignored might be a little disappointed, as the plan appears to be making this a "continuation of the Daredevil saga" and not a classic reboot. Right now there is no writer attached, and no casting. Obviously there'll be no Affleck this time. 

I encourage those who still knock Dardevil to check out the much improved director's cut Blu-Ray, and then shoot me an email with your thoughts.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse


Maybe it just took me a little longer than most. I'm not always the swiftest on the uptake. Maybe it took me until now to realize that I'm not going to get what I want out of the Twilight franchise. Vampires, werewolves, teen melodrama, all ideas that are firmly in my wheelhouse. Yet Twilight so far has endulged too much in the latter, and not enough of the former. I want big monster battles, vampires and were-dudes clawing and biting eachother with impunity. That's just not what it's about, and I've come to accept it. What Eclipse did finally give me for the first time is a reason to care about Bella(Kristen Stewart) and the odd love triangle she finds herself in with the cold vampire Edward(Robert Pattinson), and the oiled up abs of Jacob Black(Taylor Lautner).

Graduation looms on the horizon for Bella, and with it the uncertainty of her relationship with Edward. He wants to marry her. She wants to get laid, then turned into a vamp. This being Twilight, they aren't hopping into the marital bed anytime soon. Besides, she's still got some leftover feelings for furry hunk, Jacob, who never lets an opportunity to go shirtless pass him by. Edward and Jacob spend a good chunk of time staring daggers at eachother.When not eyeballing eachother, they're cracking jokes at the other's expense. Screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg seems to have no problem taking a few jabs at some of Twilight's sillier elements. When poor Bella, forced to camp out in freezing temperatureswith Jacob and Edward watching over her, Jacob offers to warm her up because "I'm hotter than you". And Team Jacob swooned.

It's a familiar setup, only the stakes have been raised with time running out for the indecisive Bella. Edward still doesn't want to turn her into a soulless monster like him. Jacob's persistence in wooing her reaches stalker levels, made creepier by his forever near naked state. I'm still wondering where his jean shorts go when he transforms? Into the same imaginary subspace pocket the Hulk's clothes go, I guess?

The Cullen Clan is forced to work alongside their hated enemies, the Werewolves, in order to protect Bella. Victoria(Bryce Dallas Howard) is back, and this time she's leading an army of powerful newborn vampires in order to get revenge for the death of her lover. This leads to a series of flashbacks amongst the Cullens, providing a much needed origin and depth to the sorely underdeveloped family of vamps. One of my biggest gripes is that I had no real reason to like any of them. They just sortof hung out in their house and looked pale for 2 1/2 hours every year. The standout is Jasper Hale, the frenzied, somewhat crazy member of the clan, who is revealed to have been a Confederate officer in the Civil War. I'll ignore the fact that Jasper develops a southern twang and deep booming bass to his voice from seemingly out of thin air.

The secretive Vulturi take on a larger, more sinister purpose here led by that paragon of evil, Dakota Fanning. They show up basically to set up whatever it is that they're hatching for the next film, and to remind us that they exist. I had totally forgotten.

Kristen Stewart still seems too good for the material presented here. Her peformances have always been a little underplayed, which fits Bella perfectly, who never seems to get riled up over anything unless she's between her two boy toys. She manages to raise the level of Rosenberg's easy script. I still can't say the same for Robert Pattinson, who continues to make even the undead seem completely dead by comparison. He's just never quite on the same page as everybody else around him. Taylor Lautner is quite the opposite, as he steals pretty much every scene not by flexing his pecs but by showing more natural charisma than I ever gave him credit for. Darnit, I guess that makes me Team Jacob, doesn't it? I sure as heck can't figure out why Bella would ever choose Edward. Like, oh my god!

From the boring direction of Catherine Hardwicke, to the hap-hazard pacing of Chris Weitz in New Moon, David Slade is the first director to nail the film's tone absolutely right. He cuts out much of the timewasting melodramatic moments of the first two films, allowing the characters to show their emotions with actions rather than with long diatribes. In fact, the one time scene that really dragged was a painfully bad sequence where Edward awkwardly expresses his love. These scenes are few and far between.

Once the crap really hits the fan, the action flies pretty quickly. The special effects are nothing to write home about. Despite all the creatures and the gloomy setting, Twilight isn't meant to be a visual juggernaut. There's one major fight sequence, and of course it's cool to see werewolves battling against vampires. The wolves themselves don't always look quite right when in action, but when they slow down they're pretty impressive. I was disappointed in the length of the fight itself, and that for such a build-up to this being a great war, the outcome never was in doubt  for a second.

I feel pretty safe in saying that none of these Twilight movies are going to be masterpieces. But they don't really have to be, do they? For someone who has never so much as cracked open one of Stephanie Meyers's novels or knows what in the sam hill a Vulturi is, Twilight is probably pretty confusing. These are movies made solely for the fans, and those fans love them with a passion that I've never seen before. Eclipse is the first time I can count myself as one of those fans. A reluctant one, but a fan nonetheless. This is the best of the series by far, and hopefully the beginning of a trend.